LATEST TWEET

© Copyright Retail Prophet Inc. 2013. All Rights Reserved.

Site by Parachute

The Future Of Brands In A One-Touch World

Posted May 28, 2015
Posted in Blog, Branding, Loyalty, Marketing, Strategy, Technology, The Future, Trends

BRANDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Doug Stephens

 

Only a short time ago, the value that brands provided to consumers was chiefly two things – familiarity and consistency. Shoppers had so little access to objective information about products and services that, amid a field of unknown and untrusted alternatives, a familiar brand logo, jingle or tag line provided the much-needed cognitive shorthand to help them confidently choose.  If you were a traveller in a strange city, you needed only to find a familiar Hilton, Marriott or Holiday Inn logo to have a consistently predictable experience. If you were shopping for beer, you knew what to expect from Budweiser or Miller – there were no surprises. Familiar and predictable, that’s what consumers wanted from brands and that’s exactly what many big brands gave them.

 

All this has now changed.  Shoppers are no longer blind to their options.  With a couple of taps of their smartphone they can gather an immediate and even geospatial understanding of product and service alternatives available to them in the moment.  Moreover, they can easily evaluate those alternatives by seeing what others think.  They can take virtual tours of stores, restaurants and hotels, watch videos of products and services.  They can be completely and objectively informed in a way that was unimaginable only 20 years ago

 

Consequently, shoppers – especially young shoppers – are no longer as dependent on brands to serve as familiar shortcuts to a decision. Now, the same traveller in a strange city can just as easily use their mobile device to find an outstanding boutique hotel to stay in.  The beer drinker can quickly gather online recommendations to learn what local craft beers are popular. Instead of deferring to the familiar and predictable, the shopper can confidently venture out to discover the new and exciting in a risk-free way.

 

The New Value Of Brands

So, if we no longer need brands to be beacons of familiarity and predictability, then what do we expect of them?  I believe that now, more than ever, we need brands to be innovators, always working to push us out of our comfort zone by offering new products, new experiences and new services that interest or excite us.   We now look to brands to catalyze change…constant change.

 

Some brands seem to implicitly get this.  Starbucks, for example, is constantly introducing new products, services, technologies and store concepts into their model.  Just when it seems they might become predictable, they introduce something new to stoke our interest and augment the brand’s appeal.

 

Amazon too is continually proffering new services, devices, concepts and products. And while some are quick to point at Amazon’s failures, like Fire Phone for example, I would argue that even those failures can and should be counted as strategic victories because, if nothing else, they reaffirm their position as an innovator.

 

Even 114-year-old Nordstrom is constantly moving its customers along a continuum of innovation like its recently introduced shop by text program.  While it would certainly be easier for Nordstrom to rest on its legendary laurels of superior customer service, it clearly recognizes that its role as a major brand lies in innovating beyond the familiar.

 

Other brands, however, like Volvo, McDonalds, Abercrombie & Fitch and Macy’s – to name only a few – have chosen to stick to the path of familiarity and dependability.  They have also suffered the consequences of doing so, with poor sales and declining customer loyalty.

Making The Cut

So, do brands still have value in the digital age?  Certainly they do.  But that value no longer lies in faithfully delivering the familiar but rather in revealing the unknown; to no longer be predictable but rather to be constantly surprising.

 

For most major brands this will require a complete organizational re-wiring – a top-to-bottom overhaul of their people, their beliefs and their manifesto and above all, a willingness to risk. This isn’t easy.  In fact, it very often proves impossible for organizations to alter the D.N.A that got them where they are.  But in a world of one-touch discovery, a relentless pursuit of quantum innovation is the only alternative brands have left.

COMMENTS

  • KP  says:

    Good take…All points to that we are living in #InformationAge in this Digitally Networked World, changing the game 360 degrees from business “dictating” to customers to now where customers choosing where to put their money in… Brands that just goes beyond offering product/service , are socially responsible and add #Value by offering superior buying experience turning #B2C into Business to Communities.
    KP
    Founder,DreamzNGoalz.com

    Reply
  • Michelle Grant  says:

    I think this is a great question to ask and one that I’ve been pondering as I examine the retail landscape. Wal-Mart has told suppliers to stop spend money on in-store marketing, using that money instead to reduce prices. It also introduced the laundry brand Persil to put pressure on the Tide, a category leader with a strong brand and a history of innovation. You also have the rise of discounters, like Aldi’s, and the greater emphasis on private label by retailers of all stripes. What is the future for brands for things that are ultimately commodities in a retail landscape that is extremely focused on low prices?

    Michelle Grant
    Head of Retailing
    Euromonitor International

    Reply
  • Andy Cavallini  says:

    …let’s not forget that brands allow peer recognition too.
    For instance, wearing a Rolex watch means I’m wealthy, successful, etc.
    ….driving a Ferrari is like wearing 10 Rolex watches…
    …and so on…

    Maybe that is the future of brands, in a commodities world.

    Andy Cavallini – http://www.gaia-matrix.com

    Reply
  • Nigel Barron  says:

    I completely agree with your insight regarding Amazon Fire. Amazon fails fast and learns from the experience. All the IP developed as a result will not go to waste.

    Reply
  • Fabien Tiburce  says:

    This is in line with the writings of Seth Godin who also argues that brands need to leave the tried-and-true behind and take a chance, make a statement and develop a unique and genuine voice. The days of mass marketing and “one size fits all” products and concepts are over. A brand can and should be experienced by different segments differently and rather than having one sales channel backed by a unique national marketing campaign, retail brands need to think in terms of many smaller and specialized channels that serve different demographics and needs. In this new environment, logistics and execution are more important than ever.
    Fabien Tiburce
    CEO, http://compliantia.com/

    Reply
  • LEAVE A COMMENT

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    *